The Role of Teachers as Facilitators in Managing Constructivist Classrooms: A Case Study on Students in the English Education Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55266/journaletanic.v2i2.416Keywords:
Classroom Management, Facilitator Role, English Language Education, Constructivist Approach, Teaching PracticesAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the role of facilitators in managing constructivist classrooms among English Education students and to analyze the practices and challenges encountered in implementing this approach. As the constructivist approach in education becomes more prevalent, it is crucial to understand how prospective English teachers perform their roles as facilitators. This research provides relevant insights for the professional development of students and the enhancement of future teaching quality. The study employs a qualitative approach with a case study method. Data were collected through questionnaires distributed to 15 English Education students and direct classroom observations. The questionnaire covered aspects of beliefs, attitudes, and practices in the facilitative role. Analysis was conducted to evaluate students' assessments of their roles, and to identify patterns and challenges in teaching practices. The results indicate that the average rating for teachers' beliefs about their facilitative role is 4.5, with student interaction receiving the highest rating (4.8). Although there is strong belief in the effectiveness of constructivist learning, some teachers remain neutral regarding its comparison with traditional teaching methods. In practice, many teachers use problem-based projects (average rating 4.0) and support active student participation in discussions (average rating 4.6). Technology use in teaching remains uneven (average rating 4.1), and there is room for improvement in providing in-depth and constructive feedback (average rating 4.5). The study identifies challenges such as time constraints, variability in student abilities, and access to technology, and provides recommendations for further training and support for teachers to enhance the implementation of constructivist approaches in the classroom.
References
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=9W_VB5TjxxoC
Du Plessis, E. (2020). Student teachers’ perceptions, experiences, and challenges regarding learner-centred teaching. South African Journal of Education, 40(1).
Gusango, E., Maani, J., & Ssetumba, J. (2021). The use of Constructivists’ Approach in Teacher Preparation; A case of Primary Teachers Colleges of South Eastern Uganda. American Journal of Education and Practice, 5(1), 53–84.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391.
Ichsan, I., Saefudin, A., & Meisarah, F. (2023). Constructivism Philosophy in Developing Prospective Educators on the Implementation of Merdeka Belajar in Vocational Schools. International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science, 2(01), 306–319.
Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. na.
Maulana, I., & Leonard, L. (2018). Pendekatan Konstruktivisme dengan Strategi Pembelajaran Tugas dan Paksa. Seminar Nasional Dan Diskusi Panel.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Trans. D. Coltman.
Pramono, G. (2023). Konstruktivisme dalam Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar (KMB). Guru Dikdas Kemdikbud. https://gurudikdas. kemdikbud. go. id/news ….
Reid-Martinez, K., & Grooms, L. D. (2021). Constructivism in 21st century online learning. In Handbook of research on modern educational technologies, applications, and management (pp. 730–743). IGI Global.
Richardson, V. (2003). Constructivist pedagogy. Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1623–1640. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9620.2003.00303.x
Rifky, S., Halik, H., Ramopoly, I. H., Karuru, P., Rodiah, I., Sukmawati, S., Wibowo, A. A. H., Pinatih, N. P. S., Bariah, S., & Harosid, H. (2024). Dasar-dasar Pendidikan: Panduan Untuk Menjadi Pengajar Profesional. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Suparlan, S. (2019). Teori konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran. Islamika, 1(2), 79–88.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Vol. null (null (ed.)).
Yakar, U., Sülü, A., Porgalı, M., & Çalış, N. (2020). From constructivist educational technology to mobile constructivism: How mobile learning serves constructivism? International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 6(1), 56–75.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yuswin Harputra, Elissa Evawani Tambunan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.