Coffee Shop sebagai Ruang Belajar Alternatif: Pengaruh Lingkungan Belajar terhadap Keterlibatan dan Kinerja Akademik Mahasiswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55266/jurnalmind.v6i2.683Kata Kunci:
coffee shop, learning environment, student engagement, academic performance, SEM-PLSAbstrak
Perkembangan pola belajar mahasiswa di era digital telah mendorong pergeseran ruang belajar dari lingkungan kampus konvensional menuju ruang-ruang informal, salah satunya coffee shop. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh learning environment pada coffee shop terhadap student engagement dan academic performance mahasiswa, serta menguji peran mediasi student engagement dalam hubungan tersebut. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif eksplanatori dengan desain cross-sectional survey. Data dikumpulkan dari 100 mahasiswa aktif di Kota Padangsidimpuan yang pernah belajar di coffee shop minimal dua kali dalam sebulan terakhir, dipilih melalui purposive sampling. Analisis data menggunakan Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) dengan bantuan SmartPLS 4. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa learning environment berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap student engagement dan academic performance, serta student engagement berpengaruh positif terhadap academic performance dan berperan sebagai mediator parsial antara learning environment dan academic performance. Temuan ini memperkuat Third Place Theory dan Self-Determination Theory dalam konteks pendidikan tinggi, sekaligus menawarkan kebaruan berupa integrasi ruang belajar informal komersial ke dalam kerangka learning environment akademik. Penelitian ini berkontribusi secara teoritis dengan memperluas cakupan learning environment di luar setting formal, dan secara praktis memberikan rekomendasi bagi perguruan tinggi serta pengelola coffee shop dalam mendesain ruang yang mendukung produktivitas belajar mahasiswa.
Unduhan
Referensi
Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297–308.
Dahal, A., Bharati, D., Subedi, K., Roka, R., Lamichhane, S., Bhandari, U., & Parajuli, S. K. (2025). Students' preference between off-campus cafes vs campus space for group studies. International Journal of Education, Management, and Technology, 3(2), 655–671.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Ferreira, J., Ferreira, C., & Bos, E. (2021). Spaces of consumption, connection, and community: Exploring the role of the coffee shop in urban lives. Geoforum, 119, 21–29.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
Kariippanon, K. E., Cliff, D. P., Lancaster, S. J., Okely, A. D., & Parrish, A.-M. (2019). Flexible learning spaces facilitate interaction, collaboration and behavioural engagement in secondary school. PLOS ONE, 14(10), e0223607.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706.
Lee, N. (2022). Third place and psychological well-being: The psychological benefits of eating and drinking places for university students. Cities, 131, 104049.
Oldenburg, R. (1999). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. Marlowe & Company.
Phan, A. N. Q., & Le, C. (2025). From coffee shops to online platforms: Students' construction of and experiences in multiple higher education learning spaces. Higher Education Research & Development, 44(1), 222–236.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.
Purwadi, Y. S., & Manurung, E. M. (2020). Cafes: New learning and knowledge production space for millennial students. Journal of Economics and Business, 3(1), 247–253.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2022). SmartPLS 4. SmartPLS GmbH.
Sun, J. C.-Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204.
Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy.
Wang, M., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 315–352.
Werdiningsih, W., & Othman, M. S. (2025). Effect of learning environment and social support on co-curricular: Mediation of academic enrichment and self-efficacy. Jurnal Educative: Journal of Educational Studies.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Abdul Rahman Suleman
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
